From job training to promotion, games that measure.
Every game is played inside an HR process. Results are measured against a written standard.
Frontline work, by its own standard.
Procedures, health and safety, and customer moments become short scenes. The examples are written for Acme, a sample company.
You're a forklift operator at the Acme warehouse. Today you'll do your pre-shift check, check loads against the plate, travel with a load, get through a blind junction, put a pallet away on the racking and park the forklift.
Safe forklift driving7 min6 scenesPlayPractice- 1Pre-shift checkSpot the errorPre-shift check
- 2Capacity plateSortCapacity plate
- 3Travelling with a loadMeasureTravelling with a load
- 4Blind junctionReplyPedestrians and junctions
- 5Putting a pallet awaySequencePutting a pallet away
- 6End-of-shift parkingPlanSafe parking
- EmergingSkips the check, lifts loads without looking at the plate, travels with the forks up, doesn't stop at junctions, leaves the forklift with the forks up and the key in.
- DevelopingDoes the check but misses some faults. Looks at the plate but doesn't work out the total weight. Slows down at junctions but doesn't stop and look.
- EffectiveReports faults, won't take a load over capacity, keeps the forks low, waits for pedestrians. Misses a step when putting away or parking.
- StrongWon't use a faulty forklift, checks loads against the plate, drives with the forks low looking the way they're going, waits for pedestrians, puts pallets away in the right order and parks safely.
General tests grounded in research.
Each test measures the same competency in every sector and role, with its basis and sources in the open.
- LadderSelf-efficacy5 minStake confidence on each rung, then see the evidence.Competency assessmentPromotionLeadership developmentBandura Self-Efficacy ScalePlay
Basis and sources
Adapted from Bandura's self-efficacy method. Level, strength and generality are reported separately. The score looks at how closely the claim matches the real difficulty of the task, and at behaviour once the evidence is revealed.
- Bandura, A. (1977) Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral changePsychological Review 84(2), 191-21510.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
- Bandura, A. (1997) Self-efficacy: The exercise of controlW. H. Freeman
- Stajkovic, A. D., Luthans, F. (1998) Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysisPsychological Bulletin 124(2), 240-26110.1037/0033-2909.124.2.240
- Moore, D. A., Healy, P. J. (2008) The trouble with overconfidencePsychological Review 115(2), 502-51710.1037/0033-295X.115.2.502
- ClaimAnalytical thinking3 minFour cards, two flips.Competency assessmentWason Selection TaskPlay
Basis and sources
Based on Wason's 1966 selection task. It measures choosing to falsify rather than confirm: of four cards, only the two that could disprove the claim are picked.
- Wason, P. C. (1966) ReasoningNew Horizons in Psychology, ed. B. M. Foss, Penguin
- Crisis DeskCrisis management5 minNow, later or let go?Leadership developmentPromotionEisenhower MatrixPlay
Basis and sources
Adapted from Eisenhower's split between urgent and important. Events land in real time and each goes into a now, later or drop box. Knock-on events show the results of earlier decisions.
- Eisenhower, D. D. (1954) Address at the Second Assembly of the World Council of ChurchesEvanston, Illinois
- ScalesDecision making4 minSet the weights first, then choose.Competency assessmentLeadership developmentMulti-Criteria Decision AnalysisPlay
Basis and sources
Adapted from the SMART weighted-sum model. The player sets the criteria weights. The score reports two things separately: fit with the weights the brief points to, and consistency with the player's own weights.
- Edwards, W., Barron, F. H. (1994) SMARTS and SMARTER: Improved simple methods for multiattribute utility measurementOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 60(3), 306-32510.1006/obhd.1994.1087
- BargainNegotiation6 minThe other side's column stays hidden.Competency assessmentPromotionIntegrative NegotiationPlay
Basis and sources
Based on multi-issue integrative negotiation and Pareto efficiency. The score measures not what players win for themselves, but how close the signed deal comes to the best joint value.
- Raiffa, H. (1982) The Art and Science of NegotiationHarvard University Press
- Thompson, L. (1990) Negotiation behavior and outcomes: Empirical evidence and theoretical issuesPsychological Bulletin 108(3), 515-53210.1037/0033-2909.108.3.515
- AllocationDelegation5 minCapacity bars fill up, then spill over.Leadership developmentPromotionResource Allocation ModelPlay
Basis
Built as an assignment problem that matches skills to capacity. Five ways delegation fails are reported separately: wrong person, unassigned work, overloaded capacity, delegated sign-off and holding on to everything.
- Shifting RuleAdaptability5 minThe rule changes without a word.Competency assessmentPromotionSet Shifting (WCST)Play
Basis and sources
Adapted from the set-shifting logic of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. It measures not accuracy, but sticking to the old rule after it changes and the cost of finding the new one.
- Berg, E. A. (1948) A simple objective technique for measuring flexibility in thinkingJournal of General Psychology 39(1), 15-2210.1080/00221309.1948.9918159
- Grant, D. A., Berg, E. A. (1948) A behavioral analysis of degree of reinforcement and ease of shifting to new responses in a Weigl-type card-sorting problemJournal of Experimental Psychology 38(4), 404-41110.1037/h0059831
- Common PotTeamwork4 minShare the pot or keep it?Competency assessmentLeadership developmentPublic Goods GamePlay
Basis and sources
Based on the repeated public goods game and the measurement of conditional cooperation. The score looks not at how much is contributed, but at whether contributions move with the table's previous round.
- Fehr, E., Gächter, S. (2000) Cooperation and punishment in public goods experimentsAmerican Economic Review 90(4), 980-99410.1257/aer.90.4.980
- Fischbacher, U., Gächter, S., Fehr, E. (2001) Are people conditionally cooperative? Evidence from a public goods experimentEconomics Letters 71(3), 397-40410.1016/S0165-1765(01)00394-9
- HorizonStrategic thinking6 minChips split across three horizons.Leadership developmentPromotionScenario Planning / Real OptionsPlay
Basis and sources
Combines scenario planning with real options thinking. The score looks at timing, not at calling the outcome: flexibility while the future is open, commitment once the signals are clear.
- Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1995) Scenario planning: A tool for strategic thinkingSloan Management Review 36(2), 25-40
- Trigeorgis, L. (1996) Real Options: Managerial Flexibility and Strategy in Resource AllocationMIT Press
The basis for measuring through play.
Research on measuring through games, situations and work samples, plus the sources behind the tests.
- Bandura, A., 1977
- Bandura, A., 1997
- Stajkovic, A. D., Luthans, F., 1998
- Moore, D. A., Healy, P. J., 2008
- Sackett, Zhang, Berry, Lievens (2022) Revisiting meta-analytic estimates of validity in personnel selection: Addressing systematic overcorrection for restriction of rangeJournal of Applied Psychology 107(11), 2040-206810.1037/apl0000994
- Landers, Sanchez (2022) Game-based, gamified, and gamefully designed assessments for employee selection: Definitions, distinctions, design, and validationInternational Journal of Selection and Assessment 30(1), 1-1310.1111/ijsa.12376
- Schmidt, Hunter (1998) The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findingsPsychological Bulletin 124(2), 262-27410.1037/0033-2909.124.2.262
- McDaniel, Hartman, Whetzel, Grubb (2007) Situational judgment tests, response instructions, and validity: A meta-analysisPersonnel Psychology 60(1), 63-9110.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00065.x
- Roth, Bobko, McFarland (2005) A meta-analysis of work sample test validity: Updating and integrating some classic literaturePersonnel Psychology 58(4), 1009-103710.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00714.x
- Hoffman, Kennedy, LoPilato, Monahan, Lance (2015) A review of the content, criterion-related, and construct-related validity of assessment center exercisesJournal of Applied Psychology 100(4), 1143-116810.1037/a0038707
- EEOC (1978) Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures, 29 CFR 1607.4(D)www.ecfr.gov/current/title-29/subtitle-B/chapter-XIV/part-1607/section-1607.4
- Bandura, A. (1977) Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral changePsychological Review 84(2), 191-21510.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
- Bandura, A. (1997) Self-efficacy: The exercise of controlW. H. Freeman
- Stajkovic, A. D., Luthans, F. (1998) Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysisPsychological Bulletin 124(2), 240-26110.1037/0033-2909.124.2.240
- Moore, D. A., Healy, P. J. (2008) The trouble with overconfidencePsychological Review 115(2), 502-51710.1037/0033-295X.115.2.502
- Wason, P. C. (1966) ReasoningNew Horizons in Psychology, ed. B. M. Foss, Penguin
- Eisenhower, D. D. (1954) Address at the Second Assembly of the World Council of ChurchesEvanston, Illinois
- Edwards, W., Barron, F. H. (1994) SMARTS and SMARTER: Improved simple methods for multiattribute utility measurementOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 60(3), 306-32510.1006/obhd.1994.1087
- Raiffa, H. (1982) The Art and Science of NegotiationHarvard University Press
- Thompson, L. (1990) Negotiation behavior and outcomes: Empirical evidence and theoretical issuesPsychological Bulletin 108(3), 515-53210.1037/0033-2909.108.3.515
- Berg, E. A. (1948) A simple objective technique for measuring flexibility in thinkingJournal of General Psychology 39(1), 15-2210.1080/00221309.1948.9918159
- Grant, D. A., Berg, E. A. (1948) A behavioral analysis of degree of reinforcement and ease of shifting to new responses in a Weigl-type card-sorting problemJournal of Experimental Psychology 38(4), 404-41110.1037/h0059831
- Fehr, E., Gächter, S. (2000) Cooperation and punishment in public goods experimentsAmerican Economic Review 90(4), 980-99410.1257/aer.90.4.980
- Fischbacher, U., Gächter, S., Fehr, E. (2001) Are people conditionally cooperative? Evidence from a public goods experimentEconomics Letters 71(3), 397-40410.1016/S0165-1765(01)00394-9
- Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1995) Scenario planning: A tool for strategic thinkingSloan Management Review 36(2), 25-40
- Trigeorgis, L. (1996) Real Options: Managerial Flexibility and Strategy in Resource AllocationMIT Press
Beside the player.
In Practice, Santi gives hints and shows the standard. In Play, Santi explains only how the game works, never the answer.
- PracticeHints, the standard and a good move.
- PlayOnly the rules of the game.